You are about to leave Risk Strategies website and view the content of an external website.
You are leaving risk-strategies.com
By accessing this link, you will be leaving Risk Strategies website and entering a website hosted by another party. Please be advised that you will no longer be subject to, or under the protection of, the privacy and security policies of Risk Strategies website. We encourage you to read and evaluate the privacy and security policies of the site you are entering, which may be different than those of Risk Strategies.
Brief Summary: On February 23, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Labor (DOL), and the Department of the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) released an FAQs document detailing the requirements for health plans to submit annual gag clause prohibition attestations to the Departments. The first attestation is due by December 31, 2023. Read on for more information.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (CAA), enacted by Congress on December 27, 2020, includes a provision that prohibits health plans (and health insurance carriers) from entering into agreements with health care providers and/or networks, third-party administrators (TPAs), or other plan service providers that include language constituting gag clauses. The FAQs state that gag clauses are contractual terms that directly or indirectly restrict specific data and information a plan can make available to another party. In this context, gag clauses contain language that directly or indirectly restricts a plan from:
CAA Gag Clause Prohibition Examples:
Example 1: A contract between a TPA and a group health plan states the plan will pay providers at certain designated rates, which the TPA considers to be confidential or proprietary and includes language in the contract prohibiting the plan from disclosing those rates to plan participants. This provision prohibiting disclosure would be considered a prohibited gag clause under the CAA.
Example 2: A contract between a TPA and a group health plan provides that the plan sponsor’s access to provider-specific cost and quality of care information is only at the discretion of the TPA. This provision would be considered a prohibited gag clause under the CAA.
Although health care providers and/or networks, TPAs, and other plan service providers may impose reasonable restrictions on the public disclosure of this information, plans must ensure that their agreements with these providers do not contain language in violation of the CAA’s prohibition on gag clauses.
The intention of these gag clause prohibitions, like other CAA health plan provisions, is to increase and enhance health plan cost transparency. See prior Risk Strategies articles detailing other recent plan cost transparency provisions here, here, and here.
Health plans are required to submit an attestation on an annual basis confirming their compliance with this gag clause prohibition requirement, as confirmed by this recent FAQs guidance. The first attestation, covering the period from December 27, 2020 through the attestation date is due by December 31, 2023.
After December 31, 2023, gag clause prohibition attestations will be due on December 31st of each year, covering the period since the last preceding attestation.
The Departments created a dedicated website (accessed here) detailing the gag clause prohibition attestation process with helpful resources for health plans, insurance carriers, and other service providers, including links to the attestation submission site, a user manual, and submission instructions.
This annual gag clause prohibition attestation requirement, initially delayed by the Departments until further guidance was issued, is now in effect with the release of these recent FAQs and due by December 31, 2023.
The chart below outlines which plans are subject to the annual gag clause prohibition attestation requirement:
Type of Plan |
Required to submit annual gag clause prohibition attestation? (Yes/No) |
ERISA Group Health Plan[1]
|
Yes |
Non-federal governmental plans[2] |
Yes |
Church plans |
Yes |
Individual health coverage plans
|
Yes |
Excepted benefit plans |
No |
Short-term, limited duration plans |
No |
Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) and other account-based plans, such as health Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) |
No |
Medicare and Medicaid plans |
No |
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) plans |
No |
TRICARE and Indian Health Service program plans |
No |
If a plan does not submit their first annual attestation by December 31, 2023, the Departments may initiate appropriate enforcement action against the plan.
Practically, employers sponsoring group health plans will need to rely on their carriers, TPAs, and other plan service providers to comply with these CAA gag clause prohibition rules since employers do not typically enter into agreements directly with health care providers and networks on behalf of their group health plan.
Compliance with CAA gag clause prohibition: Employers sponsoring group health plans are advised to confirm with their carriers, TPAs, and other plan service providers that all existing plan-related contracts do not contain prohibited gag clause language.
Annual attestation submission:
Carriers and other plan service providers will likely reach out to group health plans via email with next steps on completing these gag clause prohibition attestations. Employers are advised to pay close attention to these emails and respond accordingly to ensure timely compliance with these requirements. To avoid duplicate efforts, TPAs of self-funded plans will likely coordinate first with the plan to confirm only one entity (either the TPA OR the plan, but not both) will be submitting the attestation on behalf of the plan, consistent with the FAQs guidance.
Risk Strategies is continuing to monitor these CAA-related guidance developments and will provide updates when available. Reach out to your Risk Strategies representative with any questions or contact us directly at benefits@risk-strategies.com.
[1] Including grandfathered and grandmothered health plans.
[2] Including plans sponsored by states, counties, school districts, and municipalities.
The contents of this article are for general informational purposes only and Risk Strategies Company makes no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or completeness of any information contained herein. Any recommendations contained herein are intended to provide insight based on currently available information for consideration and should be vetted against applicable legal and business needs before application to a specific client.